Skip to main content


Why Was the Camp David Accords Such an Important Agreement for President Carter

By 2022-04-20No Comments

As frustration grew, Carter, who remained involved at every stage of the negotiations, tried to prevent the talks from failing. Following the advice of his wife, Rosalynn, he finally decided to invite Sadat and Begin to Camp David, the president`s retreat in Maryland, believing that the bucolic environment could alleviate the bitterness on all sides. „For Carter, a comprehensive peace agreement was not only the right thing to do, but he believed it would improve U.S.-Soviet relations and strengthen the U.S. position in the Arab world,“ says Craig Daigle, associate professor of history at City College New York, who is currently writing a book called Camp David and the Remaking of the Middle East. The agreements recognize the „legitimate rights of the Palestinian people“ and a process should be implemented to ensure the full autonomy of the people within five years. Begin insisted on the adjective „full“ to ensure that it was the maximum feasible political right. This full autonomy should be discussed with the participation of Israel, Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinians. The withdrawal of Israeli troops from the West Bank and Gaza Strip was agreed after the election of an autonomous authority to replace the Israeli military government. [2] The agreements did not mention the Golan Heights, Syria or Lebanon. It was not the global peace that Kissinger, Ford, Carter or Sadat had in mind during the previous US presidential change. [18] It was less clear than the Sinai Accords and was later interpreted differently by Israel, Egypt, and the United States. The fate of Jerusalem was deliberately excluded from this agreement. [19] Carter told Begin that Sadat would not continue negotiations for a peace treaty until Israeli settlements in the Sinai area were removed.

After a storm of protests, Begin finally agreed to send the settlement issue back to the Israeli Knesset for a decision: If an agreement is reached on all other Sinai issues, will all settlers be removed? He even promised to allow each member of the Knesset and cabinet to vote individually without the requirements of political party loyalty. This was acceptable to Sadat! Although the agreements were a historic agreement between two parties that often disagreed, and Sadat and Begin shared the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of this achievement (Jimmy Carter would win in 2002 „for his decades of tireless efforts to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts“), their global importance is controversial as the region is still mired in conflict. Prime Minister Menachem begins a meeting with Egyptian President Anwar Sadat at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem during Sadat`s visit to Israel on November 19, 1977. The UN General Assembly rejected the Middle East peace framework because the agreement was reached without the participation of the UN and the PLO and was incompatible with the Palestinian right of return, self-determination and national independence and sovereignty. In December 1978, the Assembly stated in resolution 33/28 A that agreements were valid only if they were within the framework of the United Nations and its Charter and resolutions, included the right of return of palestinians and the right to national independence and sovereignty in Palestine, and were concluded with the participation of the PLO. The passive position of the Security Council has also been criticized. [20] On December 6, 1979, in its resolution 34/70, the UN condemned all partial agreements and separate treaties that did not respect Palestinian rights and comprehensive solutions for peace; It condemned the continuation of the Israeli occupation and called for the withdrawal from all occupied territories. [21] On December 12, in its resolution 34/65 B, it rejected more specific parts of the Camp David Agreement and similar agreements that did not meet the above requirements. All these partial agreements and separate treaties have been condemned in the strongest terms.

The part of the Camp David Agreement that concerns the Palestinian future, and all similar parts, have been declared invalid. [22] Forty years ago, President Jimmy Carter received Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at a retreat of the US President, Camp David, in rural Maryland. Three days scheduled at Camp David turned into thirteen extremely frustrating days. When tripartite negotiations began on Wednesday, September 6, 1978, Carter found that Sadat and Begin adhered to old arguments and repetitive statements. After two days, despite some friendly moments, President Carter felt that further progress could be made if they did not meet directly. He spent a lot of time listening carefully to the fiery arguments and realized that a whole new approach was needed. Saturday, 9. Carter worked with a team led by Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski to draft a U.S.

proposal. President Carter has implemented a „single text“ strategy. The needs and requirements of both parties were integrated into the design. Then he brought this project separately to each party for points of agreement and disagreement. After twenty-three drafts and ongoing discussions on the formulation, the United States delegation drew up a final framework agreement on Sunday, 17 September, on which the Egyptians and Israelis could agree. Disagreements were excluded from this framework and were instead written in letters. Following the Camp David Comprehensive Agreement, these meetings laid the groundwork for further negotiations and the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty. The unrealized vision of this first document, as well as the successes of the second, highlight the important differences between the two conflicts and the borders created by a stagnant Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

While Egypt and Jordan have formal peace treaties with Israel, relations are limited, cold and mostly elitist due to the lack of a solution for the Palestinians. In the future, the full extent of Camp David`s legacy will depend on how its vision of a broader regional peace – with a just solution for the Palestinians – is translated into reality. Carter visited the heads of state he would have to rely on to make a peace deal workable. By the end of his first year in power, he had already met with Anwar Sadat of Egypt, King Hussein of Jordan, Hafez al-Assad of Syria and Yitzhak Rabin of Israel. Despite supporting Sadat`s peace initiative, King Hussein refused to participate in the peace talks; Begin offered Jordan little to gain, and Hussein was also afraid of isolating Jordan from the Arab world and provoking Syria and the PLO if he also participated in the peace talks. [7] Hafez al-Assad, who had no interest in negotiating peace with Israel,[8] also refused to come to the United States and only agreed to meet with Carter in Geneva. This strategy was hardly without risk. Carter`s popularity suffered from rising inflation, unemployment, and energy prices, and his advisers feared that a failure at Camp David would make him appear weak. Even his vice president, Walter Mondale, warned against this, telling him, „If you fail, we`re done.

We will weaken our stature as national leaders. Religious customs were important in planning these meetings. President Sadat used the camp`s cinema for private prayers on Fridays; the Carters used the same space as a chapel for Sunday services; and Prime Minister Begin has requested that no meeting be scheduled for Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath. Camp David: Historical Reasons for Peace Twenty-five years ago, in the isolation and solitude of Maryland`s Catoctin Mountains, three leaders came together to find a way out of years of mistrust, manipulation, war, and political stance in the Middle East. At the invitation of US President Jimmy Carter, Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat came to the president`s isolated retreat, Camp David, hoping to find ways to achieve peace in their troubled part of the world. Each leader took huge risks to be there, but the success of their meetings immediately drew the world`s attention to the courage and determination of each individual. In addition, the agreements laid the foundation for the Oslo Accords, signed by Israel in 1993, which resolved important problems and brought the region closer to a lasting peace that remains elusive. The Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) is the institution created by the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty to monitor the implementation of the security provisions of the agreement and prevent violations. .

Close Menu

T: +37065060974